, 2015; Cardoso and Souza, 2016; Santiago and you may Saliba, 2016; 2 Santos and you may Jalalzai, 2021). Within performs we’ll focus on misogyny given that acquiesced by all of our interviewees relating to Rousseff’s 6 age during the electricity, particularly targeting the partnership ranging from misogynistic backlash plus the gendered double join dynamics understood. Regarding the adopting the point we provide a very nuanced meaning getting each of the subcategories understood (pick Table dos), providing remain-by yourself significance and you will examples regarding the data and descriptive analyses out of trick moments in Rousseff’s presidency that exemplify the brand new vibrant between our nuanced suggestion having evaluating the brand new gendered double bind, misogynist backlash, and its particular impact into Rousseff’s presidency.
This new five subcategories recognized appeared in the data at the differing membership (see Tables step 3, 4). One or two themes starred in large ratio: Review so you can Guys and you will Misogynyments styled as testing to men searched in nearly half every interviews and you can portrayed 36 % regarding most of the comments codifiedments styled while the misogyny was indeed the majority comments (38 percent) and you will appeared in 49 % of all of the interview. To phrase it differently, interviewees was most cognizant from Rousseff’s part once the president in contrast some other male political figures and you will previous presidents, as well as the ways Rousseff is actually penalized while in the her management on account of gendered presumption and you can backlash.
While you are searching that have shorter volume in the interviews, additional one or two themes give important framework so you’re able to wisdom you’ll be able to sexist backlash from inside the presidency of Brazil’s earliest lady chairman. Discussions how Rousseff tried to follow gendered standards ascribed so you can feminine (Conforming with the Twice Join) starred in more 10 percent of feedback coded and CharmDate recensioner interviews presented. At the same time, talk exactly how Rousseff challenged the latest gendered expectations of their own reputation (Problematic the brand new Double Bind) starred in more you to definitely 5th of all interview, constituting sixteen % of all the comments coded.
The brand new breakdown of one’s numerical occurrence of your own thematic studies provides a starting point so you’re able to a good qualitative data of every theme, targeting the relationship ranging from for every single theme, particularly the partnership between your three templates yourself about the latest gendered twice bind (research, conforming, and you will difficult) and the misogynistic backlash one accompanied.
Evaluation so you’re able to dudes
Among subcategories understood is actually reviews out-of Dilma Rousseff so you’re able to men, both comparing Rousseff in order to men politicians and you can discussing just how something might be some other if the Rousseff was basically one. Hence, we learned that there is certainly both a conceptual component and you can simple aspect of her investigations so you’re able to men. Into the an abstract experience, we frequently saw the word, “if the she have been a guy” to explain exactly how a position might have starred aside in another way had Dilma not already been a lady. The narrative represented within our interviews is actually from a system one “prefers dudes” (Respondent 88, ), which have “no open gender discrimination, although simple fact that [a great politician] try one is actually a bonus” (Respondent 8, ). Whenever discussing this evaluation a great deal more concretely, there is certainly a look closely at Rousseff’s scratchy personality, the brand new “difficult woman up to sensitive men.” The fresh new quote below provides much more context:
Talks on the Rousseff’s impeachment therefore the sexism and you may misogyny behind the process had been talked about from inside the common mass media (Hao, 2016; Hertzman, 2016; Romero and you can Kaiser, 2016) as well as in scholarly performs (Zdebskyi ainsi que al
Yes, and additionally they said that she was a painful person, that she could not communicate with someone, you to she had an enthusiastic authoritarian way of talking. Everything that for men looks like a match “no, he’s a challenging individual, a home-confident individual that understands what he desires.” So you can their particular was presented as the bad “zero, she does not can talk, she is hard, she actually is this” from inside the an awful method. The way they communicate with us, feminine. I’ve achieved a particular condition, we’re being severe, we have been deviating out-of to how to be a woman, who’s sweet, clear, silent and you may eg. The type of Dilma being ‘s the form of women who be able to be solid within an entirely patriarchal community, up against it purchase you to exists (Respondent 79, ).
